Skip to content

fix(research-workflow): guard note and resolution JSON shapes - #7056

Open
dezren39 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
queue/11084-6857-research-workflow-json-shape
Open

dezren39 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
queue/11084-6857-research-workflow-json-shape

Conversation

@dezren39

@dezren39 dezren39 commented Nov 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Validate decoded note markers and resolution blocks before field access; report the offending file through fail().
  • Add regression coverage for malformed JSON object shapes.

Closes #6857

Verification

  • python3 -I -m unittest discover -s scripts/tests -p 'test_*workflow*.py' -v: research workflow suites passed; 119 passed, with one unrelated auto-format test failing.
  • Confirmed the auto-format failure reproduces on clean main.
  • git diff --check passed.

Autofix with [code]smith
Open in [code]smith · Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.

@dezren39
dezren39 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 8, 2026 02:22
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 57 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration

  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 2176d09c-fad7-4bb0-922e-7803e3413dab
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 801ceb9 and aee3a73.

Files selected for processing: 4

  • scripts/research_workflow.py
  • scripts/research_workflow_live.py
  • scripts/tests/test_research_workflow.py
  • scripts/tests/test_research_workflow_live.py
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: aee3a739eb

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

text = document.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
for block in c.RESOLUTION.findall(c.unfenced(text)):
if json.loads(block).get("note") == key:
entry = json.loads(block)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve the new receipt payload while scanning resolutions

If any concept contains an existing resolution block for a different note, this assignment overwrites the receipt payload constructed above with that unrelated resolution. receipt_text(note, entry) then writes the previous note's disposition and JSON under the new note's receipt filename, ignoring the requested resolution. Subsequent check rejects the receipt, and retrying resolve-note is blocked because the file already exists. Use a separate variable for the scanned resolution so the validated receipt payload remains intact.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-08T02:24:54.005434Z aee3a73 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant